Comparison of the International Trade and International Business Undergraduate Program Curricula of Turkish and USA Universities

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridSarigul, Hasmet/0000-0001-7262-6668
dc.contributor.authorSarıgül, Haşmet
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-26T17:34:48Z
dc.date.available2025-03-26T17:34:48Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentİstanbul Esenyurt Üniversitesi, Fakülteler, İşletme ve Yönetim Bilimleri Fakültesi, Uluslararası Ticaret ve Finansman Bölümü
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study is to determine whether universities that offer undergraduate programs under different names such as International Trade, International Business, International Business and Management, International Business Management, Global Business, and Global Business Management have a cross-curricular standard, and to what extent they differ or bear similarities. Therefore, the undergraduate program curricula of thirty-six Turkish and twenty-one United States universities were compared by their course names and contents. Applying the Hierarchical Cluster Analysis method, the obtained results were supported by Euclidean proximity matrix and dendrogram. The dendrogram revealed that a single cluster with two universities formed at a distance of one unit while three clusters with multiple universities formed at a distance of five units. The total number of universities in these three clusters were 23. In the ten-unit distance referenced, there were thirty-eight universities in the first duster, three universities in the second, and two universities in the third and fourth clusters, respectively. Seventeen of the United States universities gathered in the same cluster. All of the eight universities that were dissimilar and formed their own clusters within the ten-unit distance were the Turkish universities. The results revealed that there was a higher number of differences in the curricula of the Turkish universities. Considering the Euclidean proximity matrix and dusters, the names of the faculties and departments were found not to be a determinant in the similarity of the curricula.
dc.identifier.doi10.2399/yod.19.543451
dc.identifier.endpage218
dc.identifier.issn2146-796X
dc.identifier.issn2146-7978
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage205
dc.identifier.trdizinid387779
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2399/yod.19.543451
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/387779
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14704/908
dc.identifier.volume10
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000557356700008
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.institutionauthorSarigul, Hasmet
dc.language.isotr
dc.publisherDeomed Publ, Istanbul
dc.relation.ispartofYuksekogretim Dergisi
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250326
dc.subjectCurriculum; data mining; higher education; international trade
dc.titleComparison of the International Trade and International Business Undergraduate Program Curricula of Turkish and USA Universities
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
İşletme ve Yönetim Bilimleri Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu