Do 'standard laparoscopic box trainers' represent real-life conditions during transperitoneal laparoscopical interventions of the upper tract?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridCakiroglu, Basri/0000-0001-5337-5226
dc.authoridTas, Tuncay/0000-0002-3816-4874
dc.contributor.authorTaş, Tuncay
dc.contributor.authorÇakıroğlu, Basri
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-26T17:34:56Z
dc.date.available2025-03-26T17:34:56Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentİstanbul Esenyurt Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground: The purpose of this study is to investigate the representativeness of the conventional laparoscopic standard box trainers in terms of real-life circumstances in transperitoneal laparoscopical interventions of the upper tract, using questionnaire inquiries with experienced surgeons. Materials and methods: The study was conducted with 44 laparoscopists, whose level of renal surgery experience was either high (primary surgeon in >100 cases), moderate (primary surgeon in >50 cases) or basic (primary surgeon in >20 cases). We used the box widely preferred in international training courses, which consists of a 10-mm 30 degrees laparoscope, real endoscopic instruments, light source, monitor and chicken bone materials. Participants were asked whether they represent real-life situations while performing tasks by means of standard box trainers. Results: The medians of 'restrained body posture of the surgeon', 'position of monitor', 'trocars entry slots', 'tissue distance and region' and 'limited field of movement and restricted working space' were analysed on their difference from the ideal value. All the variables were shown to be significantly different from the ideal value of 5 (p < 0.001). These results suggest that experienced surgeons in our study did not find the box simulation conditions similar to real surgery conditions. Conclusion: Conventional laparoscopic trainer box, which is currently being used, is far from representing for the real situation in transperitoneal laparoscopical interventions of the upper tract.
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0391560319850428
dc.identifier.endpage206
dc.identifier.issn0391-5603
dc.identifier.issn1724-6075
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.pmid31116682
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage202
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0391560319850428
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14704/949
dc.identifier.volume86
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000487065900006
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSage Publications Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofUrologia Journal
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250326
dc.subjectLaparoscopy; standard box trainers; transperitoneal; upper tract; laparoscopic training box
dc.titleDo 'standard laparoscopic box trainers' represent real-life conditions during transperitoneal laparoscopical interventions of the upper tract?
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu